午夜亚洲国产日本电影一区二区三区,九九久久99综合一区二区,国产一级毛片视频,草莓视频在线观看精品最新

加急見刊

Science China Chemistry雜志是SCD期刊嗎?

來源:投稿網2025-01-12 9:30:15

Science China Chemistry雜志不是SCD期刊,經查詢Science China Chemistry雜志不在最新的2023年SCD期刊目錄中。

科學引文數據庫(英文名:Science Citation Database,簡稱:SCD)是《中國大學評價》課題組獨立研發、擁有全部知識產權的國內引文數據庫。2023年最新版SCD《中國科學引文數據庫》來源期刊目錄已于2022年12月公布,共涉及14個大類學科2534本期刊,相較于去年2860本期刊,本次目錄變更巨大。根據學科分類如下:

理學:共收錄198本期刊 工學:共收錄405本期刊
農學:共88本期刊 醫學:共收錄209本期刊
哲學:共收錄52本期刊 經濟學:共收錄97本期刊
法學:共收錄281本期刊 教育學:共收錄142本期刊
文學:共收錄164本期刊 歷史學:共收錄70本期刊
管理學:共收錄172本期刊 藝術學:共收錄83本期刊
交叉學科:4本期刊 綜合學科:共收錄569本期刊

SCD相關問題

問:SCD期刊是核心期刊嗎?

SCD是一個相對綜合性的數據庫,有文科也有理科刊物,有核心(統指國內的五大主流核心)也有普刊。

問:SCD期刊好發嗎?

相較于CSSCI、CSCD等核心期刊,SCD期刊相對好發一些。但此次更新后,不少好發的刊物已經被剔除。

問:哪些人適合發SCD期刊?

在讀碩士、教職人員、科研人員等。

Science China Chemistry投稿要求

Science China Chemistry雜志投稿須知:Manuscript submissionPlease provide in a cover letter the background, innovative and scientific value of the work presented in the manuscript, and authors’ publications related to this work. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is re-quired. (Please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting emails and addresses.) The authors mayrecommend 3–8 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to make evaluation of the sub-mitted manuscript.Duplicate submission is forbidden and unethical. In such cases, the journal will inform the institution of the authors and the relevant journal(s).Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to rejection.Ethical responsibilities of authorsThis journal is committed to upholding the integrity of science and the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publica-tion Ethics (COPE), the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

1、The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.。

2、The manuscript has not been published previously (part-ly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”).)。

3、A single study is not split up into several parts to in-crease the quantity of submissions and submitted to var-ious journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “sala-mi-publishing”).。

4、No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. Upon request au-thors should be prepared to submit relevant documenta-tion or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of, e.g., raw data, samples, and records.。

5、No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors’ own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given, in-cluding material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased. Quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions need to be secured for material that is copyrighted.Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.。

6、Consent to submit, including each version of the paper and any change in authorship, has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/ organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted or re-submitted for publication. In addition, authorship changes or the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of a written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision whether to accept the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.。

7、Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and there-fore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.