午夜亚洲国产日本电影一区二区三区,九九久久99综合一区二区,国产一级毛片视频,草莓视频在线观看精品最新

加急見刊

Science China Chemistry雜志評職稱可以嗎?單位認可嗎?

來源:投稿網2024-08-16 9:30:05

Science China Chemistry雜志是可以用于評職稱的。怎么判斷一本期刊是否可以用于評職稱了?首先要看期刊是否正規,正規的期刊都可在國家新聞出版總署查詢,經查詢Science China Chemistry雜志國內刊號11-5838/O6國際刊號1674-7224是一本正規雜志,其次就要看作者的專業和單位文件要求了。

評審時所選的專業方向應該與期刊方向一致,如Science China Chemistry雜志是屬于科技類的專業期刊,主要欄目包括快報;評述;論文。如果評審科技方向的職稱,Science China Chemistry雜志是個不錯的選擇。

最后一點,一定要了解清楚單位文件或者上級部門的文件具體要求,如果看不明白,或者對具體要求定義不清楚的,也可以咨詢投稿網在線客服,Science China Chemistry雜志是國家級期刊,仔細閱讀晉升文件,其中是否對期刊等級有要求,亦或者必須要科技核心、北大核心,或者是有單獨的評審認定期刊目錄。

Science China Chemistry投稿要求

Science China Chemistry雜志投稿須知:Manuscript submissionPlease provide in a cover letter the background, innovative and scientific value of the work presented in the manuscript, and authors’ publications related to this work. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is re-quired. (Please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting emails and addresses.) The authors mayrecommend 3–8 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to make evaluation of the sub-mitted manuscript.Duplicate submission is forbidden and unethical. In such cases, the journal will inform the institution of the authors and the relevant journal(s).Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to rejection.Ethical responsibilities of authorsThis journal is committed to upholding the integrity of science and the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publica-tion Ethics (COPE), the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

1、The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.。

2、The manuscript has not been published previously (part-ly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”).)。

3、A single study is not split up into several parts to in-crease the quantity of submissions and submitted to var-ious journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “sala-mi-publishing”).。

4、No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. Upon request au-thors should be prepared to submit relevant documenta-tion or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of, e.g., raw data, samples, and records.。

5、No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors’ own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given, in-cluding material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased. Quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions need to be secured for material that is copyrighted.Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.。

6、Consent to submit, including each version of the paper and any change in authorship, has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/ organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted or re-submitted for publication. In addition, authorship changes or the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of a written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision whether to accept the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.。

7、Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and there-fore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.